Nearly all cells in the human body possess the same set of genes, yet only a subset of these genes are turned “on” in any particular tissue. Tight control over which genes are “on” and “off” is intimately tied to the physical packaging of chromosomes, called chromatin structure. The continuous compaction and decondensation in chromosomal packaging is known as chromatin remodeling, a process driven by the covalent modification and physical movement of nucleosomes, the basic repeating unit of chromatin. Given that disruptions of normal gene regulation can result in cancer and developmental disorders, a molecular understanding of chromatin remodeling will allow for development of novel therapeutics that target chromatin as a means of blocking uncontrolled cell growth.
Chromatin remodelers are multicomponent protein machines that assemble, move and evict nucleosomes from DNA. The central “motor” for all remodelers is a conserved helicase-like ATPase that serves as a DNA translocase. Elegant footprinting studies from the labs of Blaine Bartholomew and Carl Wu have revealed that remodelers contact nucleosomal DNA in several distinct locations, and it is now well established that the core ATPase module translocates along nucleosomal DNA at an internal site (Figure 1). While the translocation of the ATPase module presumably disrupts histone-DNA contacts as a first step in sliding nucleosomes, it is not clear how this translocase-activity promotes movement of DNA around the histone core (Figure 2). In addition, it is not clear how the auxiliary (non-ATPase) domains participate in the remodeling reaction.
Despite tantilizing biochemical information, the three-dimensional architecture of chromatin remodelers is not known and it has therefore not been possible to determine what structural changes remodelers might undergo and how such changes drive the remodeling process. Our long-term goal is to establish a biochemical and biophysical framework necessary for describing and understanding the process of chromatin remodeling. We are focused on a monomeric chromatin remodeler called CHD1, which possesses three regions sufficient for remodeling: two N-terminal chromodomains, a central ATPase module, and a C-terminal DNA-binding region. Our strategy is to obtain high-resolution structural information using Xray crystallography, and couple this information to biochemical studies we are performing with CHD1 variants. We are currently pursuing the crystal structure of shortened CHD1 constructs and have identified several CHD1 variants which display defects in various aspects of remodeling. Preliminary data suggest that although protein domains outside the ATPase module greatly increase the efficiency of nucleosome sliding, the core ATPase module appears to be sufficient for pumping DNA around the histone core. 
- Celedon, A., I.M. Nodelman, B. Wildt, R. Dewan, P. Searson, D. Wirtz, G.D. Bowman, and S.X. Sun. (2009) Magnetic tweezers measurement of single molecule torque. Nano Lett. 9:1720-1725.
- Johnson, A., N.Y. Yao, G.D. Bowman, J. Kuriyan, and M. O'Donnell. (2006) The RFC clamp loader requires arginine finger sensors to drive DNA binding and PCNA loading. J. Biol. Chem. 281:35531-35543.
- Bowman, G.D., E.R. Goedken, S.L. Kazmirski, M. O'Donnell, and J. Kuriyan. (2005) DNA Polymerase clamp loaders and DNA recognition. FEBS Lett. 579(4):863-867.
- Goedken, E.R., S.L. Kazmirski, G.D. Bowman, M. O'Donnell, and J. Kuriyan. (2005) Mapping the interaction of DNA with the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase clamp loader complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 12(2):183-190.
- Bowman, G., M. O'Donnel, and J. Kuriyan. (2004) Structural analysis of a eukaryotic sliding DNA clamp-clamp loader complex. Nature 429:724-730.
- Bowman, G.D., I.M. Nodelman, O. Levy, S.L. Lin, P. Tian, T.J. Zamb, S.A. Udem, B. Venkataraghavan, and C.E. Schutt. (2000) Crystal structure of the oligomerization domain of NSP4 from rotavirus reveals a core metal-binding site. J. Mol. Biol. 304(5):861-871.
|
